Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Milton/Moshe Move applied to Modeling Groups |
Posted by: | Robert |
Date/Time: | 19/02/2003 17:01:06 |
John wrote "this is one of the meta points secured for NLP by the Ericksonian modeling." I can get the context if to specific then the class of generalization would most likely occour to the context and little else if not supported by other means of change. I do wonder in how Milton aquired or more did this as in changework and how you guys come to that conclusion. I just wanted also to offer my appriciation of the challenge and clarity of many posts. As in modeling for example feldenkrais I know Bandler has offered his modeling in this in trainings. I also helped a friend many years ago using the feldenkrais way as taught and used in NLP. She said she got the same sensations she had got from her sessions with a certified practitioner in feldenkrais. I also used it extensivly on many other interactions with clients with great success. One woman could suddenly walk where she moments before could hardly stand up. She had multipel skeleros and some other things going on. /Robert |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
The Milton/Moshe Move applied to Modeling Groups | 15/02/2003 22:35:28 | Eric |
Re:The Milton/Moshe Move applied to Modeling Groups | 16/02/2003 01:31:33 | Carmen Bostic |
Re:Re:The Milton/Moshe Move applied to Modeling Groups | 16/02/2003 17:53:39 | kc |
Re:Re:Re:The Milton/Moshe Move applied to Modeling Groups | 17/02/2003 05:11:02 | Eric Rudnick |
Re:Re:Re:Re:The Milton/Moshe Move applied to Modeling Groups | 17/02/2003 20:36:51 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Milton/Moshe Move applied to Modeling Groups | 18/02/2003 18:42:20 | Eric Rudnick |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Milton/Moshe Move applied to Modeling Groups | 19/02/2003 16:29:40 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Milton/Moshe Move applied to Modeling Groups | 19/02/2003 18:14:09 | Eric |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Milton/Moshe Move applied to Modeling Groups | 19/02/2003 17:01:06 | Robert |