Topic: | Re:Re:Reference to Earlier thread on Dilts's logical levels. |
Posted by: | Stephen M |
Date/Time: | 06/10/2002 17:52:25 |
Thank you for your reply. It clarifies a lot of things. Where was I when Bandler was trying to own NLP? I was watching. It was glib of me to make the comments I did without nodding my head to the fact that you, out of great personal sacrifice, helped insure that NLP remains free of the legal constraints Bandler attempted to impose. I apologise for that. I appreciate the fact that even though you found one of my remarks to be close to insulting, you took the time to reply anyway. I see that you have every right to say what you have said as co-creator and in fact may feel that it is your duty to do so. I am also clearer on why it is you said not making the content/process distinction is unethical. Thanks, Stephen |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Reference to Earlier thread on Dilts's logical levels. | 06/10/2002 10:06:51 | Stephen M. |
Re:Reference to Earlier thread on Dilts's logical levels. | 06/10/2002 15:48:06 | L7 |
Re:Reference to Earlier thread on Dilts's logical levels. | 06/10/2002 17:00:47 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Reference to Earlier thread on Dilts's logical levels. | 06/10/2002 17:52:25 | Stephen M |
Re:Re:Re:Reference to Earlier thread on Dilts's logical levels. | 06/10/2002 18:00:37 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Reference to Earlier thread on Dilts's logical levels. | 06/10/2002 20:42:36 | Stephen M |