| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall |
| Posted by: | Jim R |
| Date/Time: | 21/10/2002 23:00:18 |
|
Ulic, Part of the situation as I see it is that John is very much into doing modeling and for all practical purposes thinks that his....methods have been proven. he's certainly open to finetuning them. hence New Code. he was never familiar with M Hall's writings as recent as they are in the history of NLP and doesn't consider Michael as a peer modeler,for probably good valid reasons. I gather from John's reply that he doesn't consider anything that M Hall has written to be substantive at all about patterning nor would it be the difference that makes the difference in making the modeling process more efficient. and this is all MY MINDREAD. the efficacy and effectiveness of the approaches (IF there ever is really any thing substantive to be contrasted) will be proven in time and through time when and if Micheal or his student's students engages in Modeling of a particular skill or skills. I for one doen't see NLP as having a credibility problem nor do I forsee any mutually agreed upon criteria as being a precursor to any supposed survival of NLP modeling. Its very much alive IMHO. In fact I can't wait for John and Carmine to offer their next Modeling training in the USA. I'll be the first to sign up for it. Jim R |