Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:The future of these discussions
Posted by: Ulic
Date/Time: 31/10/2002 15:56:30

Thanks for the great reference, Jon.

I think that site could be a useful template for building a modeling project site.

Scanning through the projects on SourceForge, it looks like each project is buily upon a standard template that makes reference easy. It also looks like there is adequate ability to customize as needed.

I also like the "Most Active" and "Top Downloads" strategy. It would be interesting to add a reputation system (similar to amazon and ebay's) that allow users / readers to rate the quality of models, project methodology and ratings of the ratings.

Without trying to sound too abstract, it would be interesting to model the most effective modeling methodologies. This may be challenging in written form and may also encourage users to skip the unconscious uptake step.

I am curious regarding the value of unconscious uptake relative to different domains. Has anyone else addressed or thought about this?

For example, from my limited experience in these realms, I have had great success using unconscious uptake to model physical activites and influence strategies. I have not found unconscious uptake as useful for modeling math or XML development.


- Ulic

Entire Thread

TopicDate PostedPosted By
The future of these discussions29/10/2002 17:37:32Ulic
     Re:The future of these discussions29/10/2002 18:05:33Caefu
     Re:The future of these discussions29/10/2002 23:50:29Mike
     Re:The future of these discussions30/10/2002 19:41:39Exit
          Re:Re:The future of these discussions31/10/2002 03:31:03SMH
     Re:The future of these discussions30/10/2002 23:10:39Michael Carroll
          Re:Re:The future of these discussions31/10/2002 13:34:00Jon Edwards
               Re:Re:Re:The future of these discussions31/10/2002 15:56:30Ulic
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:The future of these discussions31/10/2002 16:44:45David Chuipka
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The future of these discussions31/10/2002 18:56:10Ulic
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The future of these discussions31/10/2002 20:52:23David Chuipka
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The future of these discussions01/11/2002 02:40:18Ulic
                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The future of these discussions15/11/2002 20:43:06David Chuipka
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:The future of these discussions31/10/2002 21:15:00Jon Edwards (not the psychic one!)
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:The future of these discussions01/11/2002 14:46:17Jon Edwards
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The future of these discussions01/11/2002 15:27:48Ulic
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The future of these discussions01/11/2002 15:59:52Jon Edwards
     Re:The future of these discussions - WFO - Index WITW16/11/2002 05:33:29Keith Fail
          Re:Re:The future of these discussions - WFO - Index WITW16/11/2002 06:55:37Stephen Michael Hawley
          Re:Re:The future of these discussions - WFO - Index WITW16/11/2002 17:23:01John Grinder
               Re:Re:Re:The future of these discussions - WFO - Index WITW19/11/2002 19:38:09Keith Fail
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:The future of these discussions - WFO - Index WITW20/11/2002 04:43:26J Rose
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:The future of these discussions - WFO - Index WITW20/11/2002 16:09:10John Grinder

Forum Home