Forum Message

Topic: Re:Relevancy of posts
Posted by: ulic
Date/Time: 06/11/2002 19:19:17


I appreciate your efforts to keep these discussion on a productive track. It can be tricky to balance quality with relevance to a large audience.

As you might guess, I see enormous value in consistent application of what might appear to be the most boring NLP pattern ever created: the well-formed outcome. As someone with a lot of experience in conflict resolution, I find the unflashy outcome procedure one of (if not the) most powerful tool that I know.

In your original message, you define three criteria for determining "relevance."

In my continued mission to explore strange new discussion groups, I would propose the following challenge to members of these discussions:

Define a sensory-based evidence criteria for a "quality post" to this forum.

- Ulic

Entire Thread

TopicDate PostedPosted By
Relevancy of posts05/11/2002 03:13:01Web Master
     Re:Relevancy of posts06/11/2002 19:19:17ulic
          Re:Re:Relevancy of posts06/11/2002 21:39:15Michael Carroll
               Re:Re:Re:Relevancy of posts08/11/2002 00:30:39Ulic
                    Re:Re:ReRe:Re:Relevancy of posts08/11/2002 01:01:46SNL
                         Re:Re:Re:ReRe:Re:Relevancy of posts08/11/2002 01:56:44Ulic
     Re:Relevancy of posts06/11/2002 19:41:22Dimitry
     Re:Relevancy of posts08/11/2002 02:05:32Joseph Stalin
          Re:Re:Relevancy of posts09/11/2002 03:18:08Ulic
               Re:Re:Re:Relevancy of posts09/11/2002 03:43:16Joe

Forum Home