Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Relevancy of posts
Posted by: Ulic
Date/Time: 08/11/2002 00:30:39

Thank you for your reply, Michael.

I acknowledge your criteria for relevance.

Is it possible to have a relevant yet low quality post?

If so, would anyone like to take a shot at defining sensory-based criteria regarding "quality?"

Another way of asking this question would be "how would you know that a post is of poor quality?"

- Ulic

Entire Thread

TopicDate PostedPosted By
Relevancy of posts05/11/2002 03:13:01Web Master
     Re:Relevancy of posts06/11/2002 19:19:17ulic
          Re:Re:Relevancy of posts06/11/2002 21:39:15Michael Carroll
               Re:Re:Re:Relevancy of posts08/11/2002 00:30:39Ulic
                    Re:Re:ReRe:Re:Relevancy of posts08/11/2002 01:01:46SNL
                         Re:Re:Re:ReRe:Re:Relevancy of posts08/11/2002 01:56:44Ulic
     Re:Relevancy of posts06/11/2002 19:41:22Dimitry
     Re:Relevancy of posts08/11/2002 02:05:32Joseph Stalin
          Re:Re:Relevancy of posts09/11/2002 03:18:08Ulic
               Re:Re:Re:Relevancy of posts09/11/2002 03:43:16Joe

Forum Home