|Topic:||Re:Re:Re:Relevancy of posts|
Thank you for your reply, Michael.|
I acknowledge your criteria for relevance.
Is it possible to have a relevant yet low quality post?
If so, would anyone like to take a shot at defining sensory-based criteria regarding "quality?"
Another way of asking this question would be "how would you know that a post is of poor quality?"
|Topic||Date Posted||Posted By|
|Relevancy of posts||05/11/2002 03:13:01||Web Master|
|Re:Relevancy of posts||06/11/2002 19:19:17||ulic|
|Re:Re:Relevancy of posts||06/11/2002 21:39:15||Michael Carroll|
|Re:Re:Re:Relevancy of posts||08/11/2002 00:30:39||Ulic|
|Re:Re:ReRe:Re:Relevancy of posts||08/11/2002 01:01:46||SNL|
|Re:Re:Re:ReRe:Re:Relevancy of posts||08/11/2002 01:56:44||Ulic|
|Re:Relevancy of posts||06/11/2002 19:41:22||Dimitry|
|Re:Relevancy of posts||08/11/2002 02:05:32||Joseph Stalin|
|Re:Re:Relevancy of posts||09/11/2002 03:18:08||Ulic|
|Re:Re:Re:Relevancy of posts||09/11/2002 03:43:16||Joe|