Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson
Posted by: Thomas
Date/Time: 10/11/2002 09:40:35

Your way of (not) responding, Dr. Grinder, raises the impression that you are only willing to discuss issues, if they serve your purpose. Which I find sad given that your website seemed to be open for discussions beyond economic interests.

Anybody who looks at NLP trainersī activity will find that money is a big - if not the - issue. One can easily verify that by comparing training fees between i.e. the Erickson foundation and NLP trainings which purport to teach Ericksonīs methods. Erickson – according to the Lankton quote – seems to have recognized that from the start on.

You and RB may have provided a linguistic representation of Erickonīs work, but it makes me wonder, if one of the co-founders is not even willing to discuss what his model might have missed. And is not willing to disclose very basic information as the amount of time spent with the model.

I suppose that J. Haley is right in saying that NLP is dead and gone.

Entire Thread

TopicDate PostedPosted By
NLP & Erickson06/11/2002 12:16:37Thomas
     Re:NLP & Erickson06/11/2002 13:15:41ernie
          Re:Re:NLP & Erickson06/11/2002 13:39:20Thomas
               Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson06/11/2002 14:13:02ernie
               Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson08/11/2002 13:25:50Mister_X
                    ReRe:Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson08/11/2002 14:30:15Bert
     Re:NLP & Erickson08/11/2002 02:51:06ernie
          Re:Re:NLP & Erickson 08/11/2002 07:28:20Thomas
               Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson 08/11/2002 14:55:29John Grinder
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson 08/11/2002 20:04:35Thomas
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson 09/11/2002 15:51:26John Grinder
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson 11/11/2002 09:21:27Eric
     Re:NLP & Erickson08/11/2002 20:01:42Harlan Kilstein
          Re:Re:NLP & Erickson08/11/2002 20:09:18Thomas
     Re:NLP & Erickson09/11/2002 06:14:39SMH
     Re:NLP & Erickson09/11/2002 12:47:49Thomas (another one)
          Re:Re:NLP & Erickson09/11/2002 18:09:13John Grinder
               Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson10/11/2002 09:40:35Thomas
                    !!10/11/2002 15:04:55John Grinder
                         Apologies!!11/11/2002 08:06:53Thomas
                              Re:Apologies!!11/11/2002 08:39:19Thomas
                              Re:Apologies!!11/11/2002 22:32:58John Grinder
                                   Milton's Extended Chaining12/11/2002 01:08:50Michael Norman
                                   Re:Re:Apologies!!12/11/2002 04:33:29Kurt
                              Re:Apologies!!11/11/2002 23:24:12John Grinder
                                   Re:Re:Apologies!!12/11/2002 03:32:11Stephen Michael Hawley
                                   Re:Re:Apologies!!12/11/2002 04:14:01Harlan Kilstein
                                        Re:Re:Re:Apologies!!12/11/2002 08:01:00Robert
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Apologies!!12/11/2002 19:24:37John Grinder
                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Apologies!!14/11/2002 02:22:41Robert
                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Apologies!!14/11/2002 16:40:22Michael Carroll

Forum Home