Forum Message

Topic: Re:Apologies!!
Posted by: John Grinder
Date/Time: 11/11/2002 23:24:12


No worries.

You are correct about the Erickson quote - my memory of the sense of it is (although I am certain that there are some word differences),

Although this work is far from a complete description of what I do, it is a far better explanation of what I do than I myself can give.

I have no idea what Erickson might have been referring to but there are a large number of things from my perspective that Erickson did (and very effectively) that failed to seize my interest enough to model them. Two categories come to mind:

1. extended chains woven essentially out of the distinctions Bandler and I coded in the two volume series Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson. M.D.

2. value biases that I found over the line with respect to content.

Please appreciate that my remarks offer here are intended to be descriptive and matters of taste, preference and possibly ethics rather than judgments about their inherent worth. Erickson was a master of communication effective to the unconscious - exquisitely so.


Entire Thread

TopicDate PostedPosted By
NLP & Erickson06/11/2002 12:16:37Thomas
     Re:NLP & Erickson06/11/2002 13:15:41ernie
          Re:Re:NLP & Erickson06/11/2002 13:39:20Thomas
               Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson06/11/2002 14:13:02ernie
               Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson08/11/2002 13:25:50Mister_X
                    ReRe:Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson08/11/2002 14:30:15Bert
     Re:NLP & Erickson08/11/2002 02:51:06ernie
          Re:Re:NLP & Erickson 08/11/2002 07:28:20Thomas
               Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson 08/11/2002 14:55:29John Grinder
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson 08/11/2002 20:04:35Thomas
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson 09/11/2002 15:51:26John Grinder
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson 11/11/2002 09:21:27Eric
     Re:NLP & Erickson08/11/2002 20:01:42Harlan Kilstein
          Re:Re:NLP & Erickson08/11/2002 20:09:18Thomas
     Re:NLP & Erickson09/11/2002 06:14:39SMH
     Re:NLP & Erickson09/11/2002 12:47:49Thomas (another one)
          Re:Re:NLP & Erickson09/11/2002 18:09:13John Grinder
               Re:Re:Re:NLP & Erickson10/11/2002 09:40:35Thomas
                    !!10/11/2002 15:04:55John Grinder
                         Apologies!!11/11/2002 08:06:53Thomas
                              Re:Apologies!!11/11/2002 08:39:19Thomas
                              Re:Apologies!!11/11/2002 22:32:58John Grinder
                                   Milton's Extended Chaining12/11/2002 01:08:50Michael Norman
                                   Re:Re:Apologies!!12/11/2002 04:33:29Kurt
                              Re:Apologies!!11/11/2002 23:24:12John Grinder
                                   Re:Re:Apologies!!12/11/2002 03:32:11Stephen Michael Hawley
                                   Re:Re:Apologies!!12/11/2002 04:14:01Harlan Kilstein
                                        Re:Re:Re:Apologies!!12/11/2002 08:01:00Robert
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Apologies!!12/11/2002 19:24:37John Grinder
                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Apologies!!14/11/2002 02:22:41Robert
                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Apologies!!14/11/2002 16:40:22Michael Carroll

Forum Home