Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:ReRe:An Answer to John Grinder #1
Posted by: Zigfield Roy
Date/Time: 25/11/2002 22:26:13

To Keith


I really enjoyed your clever and informative reply.  Now to simply understand with more detail of what you actually are saying context wise.   Mind I ask a few more probing questions?


How does all these transforms/filters that Dr Grinders and MS Bostics'outline and define in Whispering  relate to communicating with more detail? More precision?   

Keith how does Dr Halls use of state upon state relate to building a higher skill level for me a begginer?  Doesn't a strong state just follow naturally if I am in the moment (demon state)
mebecause I posses ntally a clear direction in mind from my present state to my desired state? Do I really need to bump myself up into another higher state of mind. Doesn't that sensory switch with some F2 descriptions just muddy my focus and load up my internal dialogue which will limit my ability to see what is right there in front of me at that precise moment?

Example..If I am on the telephone selling widgets and getting strong responses from my prospcts using a simple telescript and my state and use of language is tuned into the other individuals model of the world gaining rapport and getting favorable results why would I move to another state? Why would I need another skill unless out of a new necesity popping up?

Your attention and perception again deeply appreciated


Entire Thread

TopicDate PostedPosted By
An Answer to John Grinder #104/08/2002 13:59:20Zaphod
     Copy of Mr. Hall's response article included here04/08/2002 19:03:39nj
     ReRe:An Answer to John Grinder #123/11/2002 21:07:02Zigfield Roy
          Re:ReRe:An Answer to John Grinder #125/11/2002 09:27:44Keith Fail
               Re:Re:ReRe:An Answer to John Grinder #125/11/2002 22:26:13Zigfield Roy
                    Re:Re:Re:ReRe:An Answer to John Grinder #126/11/2002 09:16:46Keith Fail
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:ReRe:An Answer to John Grinder #127/11/2002 17:29:10John Grinder
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:ReRe:An Answer to John Grinder #127/11/2002 17:41:35John Grinder
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:ReRe:An Answer to John Grinder #127/11/2002 18:32:02John Schertzer
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:ReRe:An Answer to John Grinder #112/12/2002 19:15:55Zig

Forum Home