|Topic:||Re:Re:Exemplars and Modelling|
|Posted by:||John Grinder|
Where do you get the idea that Erickson was resistant to the idea that he could be modeled"
The nut and shell metaphor has a ton of intrepretations - my favorite being the one posted on an earlier thread by some worthy whose name presently escapes me: of course, we got the shell (the form) as that is precisely what we went after and not the nut (the content - that is, his own beliefs and values).
I never had any communication from Erickson that indicated that he ever had any difficulty with the idea that we would model him.
I supose that in the midst of this speculation it is perfectly natural to pass over the one unambiguous statement he publicly made about the work Bandler and I did in favor of hallucinating your favorite response from a man you never met.
All the best,
|Topic||Date Posted||Posted By|
|Exemplars and Modelling||19/12/2002 09:06:39||Loren Larsen|
|Re:Exemplars and Modelling||19/12/2002 10:58:35||Lewis Walker|
|Re:Re:Exemplars and Modelling||20/12/2002 05:38:37||Loren Larsen|
|Re:Re:Re:Exemplars and Modelling||20/12/2002 15:05:40||Lewis Walker|
|Re:Re:Re:Re:Exemplars and Modelling||20/12/2002 19:48:41||Loren Larsen|
|Re:Exemplars and Modelling||19/12/2002 18:01:25||John Grinder|
|Re:Re:Exemplars and Modelling||20/12/2002 03:41:22||Loren Larsen|
|Re:Exemplars and Modelling||20/12/2002 00:45:46||Harlan Kilstein|
|Re:Re:Exemplars and Modelling||20/12/2002 02:18:39||John Grinder|
|Re:Re:Re:Exemplars and Modelling||20/12/2002 03:40:25||Harlan Kilstein|
|Re:Re:Re:Re:Exemplars and Modelling||20/12/2002 06:38:59||John Grinder|