| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Congruency and modeling |
| Posted by: | John Grinder |
| Date/Time: | 12/01/2003 17:48:59 |
|
Greetings, Lewis Couple of comments: 1. if you use physiology as the core self-cueing, self anchoring mechanism (that is, a natural anchor as opposed to an artificial anchor), then you are already cross contextual with respect to availability. 2. I get the impression reading what you wrote of a single (or small set of content free, high performance states) that are re-used continuously. My own preferences (and actual experience) are to frequently change the members of this set of content free, high performance states. The "tuning up" you refer to I accomplish by seeking out and addressing challenges in the world about me - anything from climbing rock through genuinely engaging puzzles that arise as part of the corporate work Carmen and I do to figuring out how to teach algebra to my 4 year old grandson, John Conrad. The world is variable enough when fully engaged to push me into developing constantly evolving different high performance states. Bateson: (half remembered counsel) Noise/chaos is to be embraced as it is the only source of new patterning (by the way, this is a description of the experience I have had each and every time I do a significant piece of modeling). I would add that experience (FA) is also the most powerful source of consistently corrective feedback about the insanities of f2 that we constantly have access to. Does this work for you? All the best, John |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Congruency and modeling | 09/01/2003 04:12:48 | Martin Messier |
| Re:Congruency and modeling | 09/01/2003 13:12:51 | Lewis Walker |
| Re:Re:Congruency and modeling | 09/01/2003 14:59:23 | Zhi Zhi Chien |
| Re:Re:Congruency and modeling | 09/01/2003 15:09:14 | Martin Messier |
| Re:Re:Re:Congruency and modeling | 11/01/2003 17:44:40 | John Grinder |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Congruency and modeling | 11/01/2003 19:17:55 | Lewis Walker |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Congruency and modeling | 12/01/2003 06:28:38 | John Grinder |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Congruency and modeling | 12/01/2003 10:55:13 | Lewis Walker |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Congruency and modeling | 12/01/2003 17:48:59 | John Grinder |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Congruency and modeling | 13/01/2003 20:52:07 | Lewis Walker |
| Stalking | 15/01/2003 23:25:34 | Lars Ejstrup Gredal |
| Re:Stalking | 16/01/2003 15:21:00 | Lewis Walker |
| Re:Re:Stalking | 16/01/2003 23:04:25 | Lars Ejstrup Gredal |
| Re:Re:Re:Stalking | 17/01/2003 16:47:37 | Lewis Walker |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Stalking | 17/01/2003 19:21:11 | John Grinder |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Stalking | 17/01/2003 22:24:41 | Lewis Walker |
| process/content | 18/01/2003 00:15:36 | Lars Ejstrup Gredal |
| Re:process/content | 18/01/2003 18:58:51 | John Grinder |
| Clean third | 19/01/2003 00:01:17 | Lars Ejstrup Gredal |
| Re:Clean third | 19/01/2003 14:01:35 | Jon Edwards |