| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:The Bateson part of your book |
| Posted by: | John Grinder |
| Date/Time: | 18/03/2003 23:34:40 |
|
Chad You are correct - I never did. There were clearly some presentation patterns that I modeled from Bateson, some thinking patterns... but you're correct, I never did a deep modeling of Gregory. Puzzling, isn't it? John |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| The Bateson part of your book | 18/03/2003 19:51:22 | Chad Alexio |
| Re:The Bateson part of your book | 18/03/2003 21:49:16 | John Grinder |
| Re:Re:The Bateson part of your book | 18/03/2003 23:17:06 | Chad |
| Re:Re:Re:The Bateson part of your book | 18/03/2003 23:34:40 | John Grinder |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:The Bateson part of your book | 19/03/2003 02:39:41 | Stephen |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Bateson part of your book | 19/03/2003 20:35:38 | John Grinder |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Bateson part of your book | 20/03/2003 02:29:43 | Stephen |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Bateson part of your book | 20/03/2003 16:13:13 | Jim R |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Bateson part of your book | 21/03/2003 02:14:41 | Stephen |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Bateson part of your book | 21/03/2003 04:19:37 | gary fuller |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The Bateson part of your book | 21/03/2003 04:40:43 | Thetan |