Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Medical epistemology: Can it accept NLP?
Posted by: Robert
Date/Time: 30/03/2003 23:26:24

Lewis,
"Your presupposition is that these practitioners (medical, psychiatric or otherwise) are more keen to make money than help patients get better...and are therefore not interested in more effective treatment. This is the kind of unthinking drivel perpetuated by many NLP practitioners...usually directed against the US healthcare system. In the UK, the National Health Service (including psychology)is free at point of delivery...and any patient I use NLP interventions with gets it for free. "

I agree that some aim for a more money making practice where they charge a lot for the change.

There is however a lack of taking new methods like acupuncture who has been around now for 30 years and finnaly make it into the mainstream hospitals.

I did mean that many who do practice will not do effective help if they can keep the patient longer in the system. It is a setup to do a job and then not do much more.
I can not understand that tho myself ;)

There is many levels of change for clients.
Many who needs it a lot cant afford high level charges.

It has to be some balance. I saw a documentry where a doctor had to work 12 hour shifts to pay for insurance and such to keep the job going.
It is in the USA but that really hurts.

/Robert


Entire Thread

TopicDate PostedPosted By
Series of articles on NLP in British Medical Journal18/03/2003 18:54:31Peter Davies
     Re:Series of articles on NLP in British Medical Journal18/03/2003 22:03:40John Grinder
          Re:Re:Series of articles on NLP in British Medical Journal19/03/2003 00:20:20nonlpfan@sk.com
               Re:Re:Re:Series of articles on NLP in British Medical Journal19/03/2003 02:43:57Stephen
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Series of articles on NLP in British Medical Journal19/03/2003 09:44:39Michael Carroll
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Series of articles on NLP in British Medical Journal20/03/2003 02:41:19Stephen
     Re:Series of articles on NLP in British Medical Journal19/03/2003 15:11:28John Schertzer
     Re:Series of articles on NLP in British Medical Journal20/03/2003 01:13:29Michael Carroll
          Medical epistemology: Can it accept NLP?22/03/2003 09:40:55Peter Davies
               Re:Medical epistemology: Can it accept NLP?22/03/2003 17:56:25Lewis Walker
                    Re:Re:Medical epistemology: Can it accept NLP?26/03/2003 21:27:17Robert
                         Re:Re:Re:Medical epistemology: Can it accept NLP?27/03/2003 12:31:39Lewis Walker
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Medical epistemology: Can it accept NLP?29/03/2003 07:35:01John Grinder
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Medical epistemology: Can it accept NLP?29/03/2003 08:56:12Peter Davies
                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Medical epistemology: Can it accept NLP?29/03/2003 21:40:30John Grinder
                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Medical epistemology: Can it accept NLP?31/03/2003 20:27:49Lewis Walker
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Medical epistemology: Can it accept NLP?29/03/2003 13:55:08Robert
                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Medical epistemology: Can it accept NLP?29/03/2003 23:53:01Lewis Walker
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Medical epistemology: Can it accept NLP?30/03/2003 23:26:24Robert
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Medical epistemology: Can it accept NLP?31/03/2003 11:22:04John Grinder

Forum Home