| Topic: | Re:Re:Unified Field theory and NLP |
| Posted by: | Michael Carroll |
| Date/Time: | 31/07/2003 09:58:24 |
|
Doug You wrote"Dilt's 'Unified Field Theory' would be considered content filled, very filled. It's bedrock is 'logical levels', Dilts' unfified theory contains a content model called 'neurological levels' which is something altogether different from 'logical levels' Michael |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Unified Field theory and NLP | 31/07/2003 03:51:03 | Renee Levant |
| Re:Unified Field theory and NLP | 31/07/2003 05:26:11 | doug |
| Re:Re:Unified Field theory and NLP | 31/07/2003 09:58:24 | Michael Carroll |
| Re:Re:Re:Unified Field theory and NLP | 31/07/2003 14:29:04 | doug |
| neurological levels | 31/07/2003 21:41:56 | doug |
| Re:neurological levels | 11/09/2003 22:51:31 | Todd |
| Re:Re:neurological levels | 12/09/2003 01:04:54 | Todd Sloane |
| Guys......may be u see ToE here..... | 19/01/2004 16:40:02 | genius |