Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:To: Siwaya. Re: Mr. Hall's response to Dr. Grinder's critiques. Topics:Epistemology,Origins/Definitions |
Posted by: | siwaya |
Date/Time: | 06/08/2002 14:31:26 |
nj said: "Whether or not you are a native speaker of English, you probably don't know whether you have insulted Dr. Grinder or Ms. Bostic St Clair." Even though I was raised speaking English, at this point in time I do not have any reason to believe that I have not insulted Dr. Grinder, Ms. BSC, you or any of your friends who might be on this list. There simply is not the appropriate feedback, yet. Although the Redskins didn't look back the other day, considering this conversation. nj said: "Your first post to this thread can be construed..." construed by who, nj? nj said this: "So I could conclude that you think Dr. Hall will post in this forum" I still feel the exact same: Dr. Hall seems very open to a dialog AND he might not dialog here. I have to go to the bathroom right now, but i might not use the bathroom three doors down- it depends on many factors. But I must know: #1. From what you said in your last post must I conclude that you are interested in understanding my interest in your enthusiasm? #2. Has your thought any relation to the only time you never began to form a conclusion about the difference between pointing out a significant distinction between a set of statements and veiling a hidden adgenda in the cloak of an intellectual conversation? Siwaya |