Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations
Posted by: GSM
Date/Time: 20/10/2003 23:57:59

nj wrote:
"Meta-model violations are not necessarily caused by anything, regardless of what causes the speech acts describable as meta-model violations."

Can we not, using our intuition (aka new code nlp), make it more explicit about what specifically makes a meta-model violation and how it is made (the performance variable) in order to enhance our interventions?

Entire Thread

TopicDate PostedPosted By
Meta-model violations16/10/2003 15:13:06GSM
     Re:Meta-model violations16/10/2003 18:26:56John Grinder
          Re:Re:Meta-model violations16/10/2003 19:05:53GSM
               Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations16/10/2003 21:24:45nj
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations17/10/2003 10:02:27nj
               Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations16/10/2003 21:25:42Jim R
               Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations17/10/2003 00:15:04John Grinder
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations17/10/2003 02:13:07Martin Messier
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations17/10/2003 11:20:39GSM
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations17/10/2003 21:44:14nj
               Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations17/10/2003 22:19:37Jim R
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations17/10/2003 23:35:14GSM
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations18/10/2003 00:04:04Ryan Nagy
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations18/10/2003 08:15:21GSM
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations19/10/2003 01:31:06Jim R
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations19/10/2003 03:45:04.
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations19/10/2003 07:45:12Jim R
                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations19/10/2003 10:06:35GSM
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations19/10/2003 10:07:29GSM
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations20/10/2003 01:12:26Jim R
                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations20/10/2003 12:03:53GSM
                                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations20/10/2003 14:35:27Jim R
                                                            Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations20/10/2003 15:06:18GSM
                                                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations20/10/2003 17:19:52Jim R
                                                                      Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations20/10/2003 17:31:00GSM
                                                            Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations20/10/2003 17:03:21.
                                                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations20/10/2003 21:31:26Jim R
                                                                      Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations20/10/2003 21:57:57.
                                                                 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations20/10/2003 23:44:17nj
                                                                      Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations20/10/2003 23:57:59GSM
                                                                           Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations21/10/2003 01:50:12nj
                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Meta-model violations19/10/2003 22:46:34.

Forum Home