Forum Message

Topic: Re:Grinder's reply to Hall
Posted by: Jim R
Date/Time: 19/11/2003 06:57:15

Ed,

this debate won't ever really continue because (at least to me) John's made it pretty clear that he's not interested in the discussion. now everyone in this thread can speculate about why that maybe but the bottom line is,unless John decides to engage Micheal(and I'm pretty sure he won't),then its all really a moot point.

I did read the article myself and Micheal apparently thinks that he has answered some of John previous questions(challenges) and then cites this references and that reference as "proof" that he's done so. but John's initial reply is the very feedback that in fact Michael hasn't and certainly not to John's standards. In any event, there's certainly going to some more comments about Michael's reply and some meta comments about both John and Michael for sure yet the end result is that unless John decided to engage Micheal than there is no debate.

Jim R


Entire Thread

TopicDate PostedPosted By
Grinder's reply to Hall 21/10/2002 01:29:58Michael Carroll
     Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 21/10/2002 04:59:19thepropagandist
     Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 21/10/2002 17:28:45Ulic
          Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 21/10/2002 19:30:23Jim R
               Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 21/10/2002 21:21:16Ulic
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 21/10/2002 23:00:18Jim R
               Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 21/10/2002 22:42:13thepropagandist
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 22/10/2002 10:19:04Robert (SwedishNLP)
          Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 21/10/2002 20:11:40Robert (swedishNLP)
               Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 22/10/2002 19:04:58thepropagandist
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 22/10/2002 21:15:42Robert
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 22/10/2002 22:15:52thepropagandist
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 23/10/2002 04:38:15Pulsed
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 23/10/2002 18:51:15thepropagandist
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 30/10/2002 21:40:14Robert
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 23/10/2002 04:34:22Pulsed
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 30/10/2002 22:05:54Robert
     Hall's Reply to Grinder's reply to Hall's Reply to 02/11/2002 19:19:26Ed Borasky
          Re:Hall's Reply to Grinder's reply to Hall's Reply to 18/11/2003 08:31:35Diogeneze
               Re:Re:Hall's Reply to Grinder's reply to Hall's Reply to 18/11/2003 11:03:01Stephen Bray
     Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 19/11/2003 06:57:15Jim R
          Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 19/11/2003 08:31:09Stephen Bray
               Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 19/11/2003 20:20:32John Schertzer
               Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 19/11/2003 23:40:09Jim R
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 20/11/2003 15:32:34John Schertzer
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 21/11/2003 01:00:12Jim R
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall 21/11/2003 02:02:02Sean

Forum Home