Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Grinder's reply to Hall |
Posted by: | John Schertzer |
Date/Time: | 20/11/2003 15:32:34 |
Jim, If mine is one of the moot and academic arguments, please excuse me, but I've for a long time wanted to point out that M Hall's work is based on premises he doesn't really understand, and I've wanted to partially because I feel he's forever at work to undermine other people's work, ie his review of Steve Andreas' book. At the same time, in spite of himself, I believe he makes a valuable contribution at times, and I've usde some of his processes myself. best, JS |