Topic: | Re:Re: applications and new models |
Posted by: | nj |
Date/Time: | 07/09/2002 19:12:57 |
Hello, Noah. In the first post to this thread, you wrote: "To all Please go read on Answers to Grinder 7/9/2002 at 16:22:22. I think the lady who wrote that post has a entertraining thought and I politely invite you to read.. all the best Noah" I interpret what you wrote to mean the following: 1. Go read post "Hall's Answers to Grinder", posted on 7/9/2002 at 16:22:22. 2. A lady wrote that post. 3. The writer of that post has an entertaining thought. 4. I politely ask you to read her post. I did go read the post, "Hall's Answers to Grinder", posted on 7/9/2002 at 16:22:22. I searched for evidence to support the truth of my interpretations "2" and "3". I would have read "Hall's Answers to Grinder", posted on 7/9/2002 at 16:22:22, without having read the post that this post replies to. -nj |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Re: applications and new models | 07/09/2002 16:28:40 | Noah |
Re:Re: applications and new models | 07/09/2002 19:12:57 | nj |
Re:Re:Re: applications and new models | 07/09/2002 20:18:26 | nj |
ReRe:Re: applications and new models | 07/09/2002 22:25:42 | The Mad Hatter |
ReReReRe: applications and new models | 07/09/2002 22:28:18 | Noah |
ReRe:ReReReRe: applications and new models | 07/09/2002 23:41:08 | The Mad Hatter |
ReReReRe:Re: applications and new models | 07/09/2002 23:45:13 | Noah |
ReRe:ReReReRe:Re: applications and new models | 21/09/2002 19:00:18 | Noah |