In Whispering and other sources, I have seen the example of unconscious logic illustrated thus: Men are mortal. Grass is mortal. Men are grass. By this am I to gather that the unconscious works through giving entities mutual indentities through shared qualities? That is: A has quality C. B has quality C. Therefore A and B are identical. If this is so, is this also the "logic" of anchoring?  That is, is the equating of two different stimuli to "mean" a single response a similar "logic"?  Or is it something different? Does symbolism work by this sort of logic?  That two disparate things equate through sharing a quality? I hate to admit it, as it seems to be such a simple issue, but I find just what is meant by the statement that the first syllogism as a representative of unconscious logic to be confusing. If anyone would care to illustrate a few more examples or give some more detailed explanations on the issue I would appreciate it greatly.