Topic: | NLP Research |
Posted by: | Sarah |
Date/Time: | 11/05/2004 16:35:20 |
Dear John & Carmen, From reading your book 'Whispering in the Wind', I got the sense from how you've written it, it was amongst other things to initiate NLP being taken seriously as a discipline and give it some sort of scientific grounding (throughout you make suggestions about scientific research with regard to some of the NLP models). Personally I have a belief that NLP works as I've experienced long lasting results of work I've done with clients in a therapeutic setting. There are also vast quantities of anecdotal evidence out there to suggest it works as well. However, it seems that scientific evidence seems somewhat lacking, and in your book you suggest that some of the work that has been carried out has used inappropriate techniques. However, I think for NLP to be ever taken seriously in the Psychology/scientific community then good quality research really needs to be performed. At the end of the day, isn't NLP just a wing of the study of Psychology, called human excellence/maximising brain potential? (just my own view point :-) ) I would also like to see NLP as scientifically established if only to increase my own congruence with the subject. I am passionate enough about this issue that I am considering doing a MSc or PhD to start researching this. However, with NLP being such a large subject I not actually sure where to begin. For example the first thing I was taught in NLP was the 'communication model' - where can I find out what research has already been conducted? Would this be a good place to start or do you have an opinion on what research would be most productive. Do you know of any accredited academic institutes that would support NLP related research (anywhere in the world)? In addition my first degree is in Biotechnology so I may need to do some additional qualifications before I can even take up a research position. From my initial survey of scientific recognised subjects that come close to NLP are Cognitive Psychology/Neuroscience, would I be right in this conclusion? Anyway I know I have asked lots of questions here but I would very much appreciate you opinion these. Best regards, Sarah. |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
NLP Research | 11/05/2004 16:35:20 | Sarah |
Re:NLP Research | 11/05/2004 18:24:37 | nj |
Re:Re:NLP Research | 11/05/2004 20:41:28 | Pete West |
Re:Re:Re:NLP Research | 11/05/2004 20:54:03 | |
Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP Research | 11/05/2004 20:59:28 | Pete |
Re:NLP Research | 11/05/2004 18:47:59 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:NLP Research | 20/05/2004 09:56:51 | nj |
Re:Re:Re:NLP Research | 20/05/2004 10:19:42 | |
Re:Re:Re:NLP Research | 23/05/2004 05:14:49 | nj |
Re:Re:Re:NLP Research | 23/05/2004 05:37:02 | nj |
Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP Research | 23/05/2004 22:49:29 | nj |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP Research | 24/05/2004 10:59:48 | e_lie |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP Research | 25/05/2004 02:15:09 | nj |
Modelling vs 2nd position | 25/05/2004 02:56:43 | Greg Alexander |
Re:Modelling vs 2nd position | 25/05/2004 10:07:34 | nj |
Re:Modelling vs 2nd position | 25/05/2004 15:38:11 | Greg Alexander |
Re:Re:Modelling vs 2nd position | 25/05/2004 17:35:30 | nj |
Re:Re:Modelling vs 2nd position | 25/05/2004 18:58:51 | Venus Brown |
Re:Re:Re:Modelling vs 2nd position | 25/05/2004 19:41:34 | nj |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Modelling vs 2nd position | 25/05/2004 19:46:20 | nj |
new thread? | 26/05/2004 00:09:51 | Greg Alexander |
Re:Modelling vs 2nd position | 25/05/2004 23:55:41 | Greg Alexander |
Re:Re:Modelling vs 2nd position | 26/05/2004 00:52:45 | Venus Brown |
Re:Re:Modelling vs 2nd position | 27/05/2004 19:17:03 | nj |
Re:Modelling vs 2nd position | 27/05/2004 18:52:55 | nj |
Re:Re:NLP Research | 21/05/2004 05:46:41 | nj |
Re:Re:Re:NLP Research | 21/05/2004 10:46:29 | e_lie |
Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP Research | 21/05/2004 11:13:23 | nj |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP Research | 21/05/2004 11:23:00 | e_lie |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP Research | 21/05/2004 11:29:01 | nj |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLP Research | 21/05/2004 11:36:17 | e_lie |
Re:NLP Research | 16/05/2004 17:38:42 | Sarah |
Re:Re:NLP Research | 16/05/2004 23:52:40 | nj |
Re:Re:Re:NLP Research | 18/05/2004 10:21:35 | Sarah |
Re:NLP Research | 19/05/2004 09:56:04 | Greg Alexander |
Re:NLP Research | 19/05/2004 22:41:09 | Todd |