|Topic:||Re:Re:Different approaches to modeling|
|Posted by:||James Tsakalos|
My ultimate outcome when modeling is to be able to perform as well as the model. If I do it in the same way but without getting the same calibre of results, then I don't consider that a successful outcome. On the other hand, if I get great results by doing it quite differently, then how have I modeled another person's skill?
I agree that we add our own biases when we include f2 filters - that's the inherent problem of including such things as values and beliefs when modeling. Those things are purely content, not process, and any attempt to replicate them in ourselves is pure hallucination. We are just plain making it up.
But could those hallucinations be *useful* hallucinations, like the hallucinations one has when position shifting? It seems to me (and this is only my personal subjective experience) that those hallucinations help a lot in 'getting the state right'. They seem to provide a kind of short-cut to congruency in performing the skill (at which point they can be discarded).
In any case, since everything seems to come back to outcome and intention, let's go there.
Suppose someone is familiar with an INLPTA-style approach to modeling and it serves them well, and then they learn modeling a la Whispering. For what purpose should they discard the strategies that have worked for them in the past in favour of only doing "pure NLP" modeling?
|Topic||Date Posted||Posted By|
|Different approaches to modeling||26/05/2004 02:52:56||James Tsakalos|
|Strategies (an issue yet to be addressed)||26/05/2004 03:33:13||James Tsakalos|
|Re:Different approaches to modeling||26/05/2004 09:05:50||Greg Alexander|
|Re:Re:Different approaches to modeling||26/05/2004 12:59:06||James Tsakalos|
|Re:Re:Re:Different approaches to modeling||27/05/2004 02:42:52||todd S|
|Re:Different approaches to modeling||27/05/2004 05:51:45||Greg Alexander|
|Re:Re:Different approaches to modeling||27/05/2004 12:10:13||James Tsakalos|
|Re:Different approaches to modeling||29/05/2004 06:15:28||Greg Alexander|
|Re:Re:Different approaches to modeling||29/05/2004 14:26:36||James Tsakalos|
|Doing it differently||26/05/2004 13:05:50||James Tsakalos|
|Re:Doing it differently||26/05/2004 14:32:09||Jules Colllingwood|
|Re:Re:Doing it differently||27/05/2004 00:29:04||James Tsakalos|
|Modeling doesn't end with the uptake||27/05/2004 14:01:11||James Tsakalos|
|Re:Modeling doesn't end with the uptake||28/05/2004 09:56:02||Jules Collingwood|
|Re:Re:Modeling doesn't end with the uptake||28/05/2004 16:30:25||John Schertzer|
|Re:Re:Modeling doesn't end with the uptake||28/05/2004 17:07:03||Jim r|
|Re:Re:Modeling doesn't end with the uptake||29/05/2004 14:39:56||James Tsakalos|
|Re:Different approaches to modeling||28/05/2004 22:25:48||JPG|
|Re:Re:Different approaches to modeling||29/05/2004 15:20:16||James Tsakalos|
|Re:Re:Re:Different approaches to modeling||29/05/2004 17:08:32||John Grinder|
|Re:Re:Re:Re:Different approaches to modeling||30/05/2004 08:38:13||James Tsakalos|
|Re:Re:Different approaches to modeling||01/06/2004 13:32:37||amilcar|
|Re:Re:Re:Different approaches to modeling||02/06/2004 11:25:41||JPG|