Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Descartes' original sin - f1/f2 |
Posted by: | John Schertzer |
Date/Time: | 01/04/2005 21:35:00 |
GSM "F1 and f2 transforms are not mutually exclusive..." I'm in complete agreement with you. What I am saying is that to posit such an idea as F1, and F2, is in essence cartesian, since we are here taking F2 representations as being about (not my personal position, however) what is available through FA (post-F1). The hard distinction between purely somatic (of the body sensory systems) filters and linguistic filters (other than those of the body's sensory systems), is essentialist and cartesian. But that's okay. We can live with it, and I have been giving numerous sensory-based examples all along, as to how that might work. be well, JS |