Topic: | Re:Re:Re::Re:Re:Re:Descartes.../Shortr Exp |
Posted by: | Martin Messier |
Date/Time: | 04/04/2005 17:56:30 |
Hi James, Thanks for the post. I loved the example you cited. You wrote: "You're observing physiological processes and concluding that "there's something non-physiological [ie, something other than what is observable] that runs the show"" That's exactly my point! How the heck am making those conclusions, mistaken or not? IYO, does our ability to create meaning reside exclusively in physiology? Martin |