JS You wrote "Remember, as well, that the internal representations that make up the explanation, internal or external auditory distinctions that make up the words, the kinaesthetic experience of subvocalization, or during the act speech, the internal referential images constructed, and all supporting synesthesias, are all sensory experiences as well, and therefore FA" FA is what you see, hear and feel after f1 mappings (before coding).  Let’s say you meet me, you see me at FA. As part of your F2 mapping processes you access a visual representation of Michael Carroll when you last met me. The visual internal representation is in the set of f2 transforms as it has already transformed and coded. In this example the internal image helps you code the present FA i.e naming me as Michael Carroll. f2 of course can feed forward and directly impact what's occurring at FA and again f1. An example of this would be Ericksonian hypnosis, where the listener attempts to make sense of the induction at f2, is overloaded and goes into an altered state at FA. In the trance the person may have a positive or negative hallucination which is a change in processing at f1. In the case of binaural sounds, there is probably an element of overload occurring in f2 as well, which will feed forward to FA.  I didn’t mention that my previous post. Regards Michael Carroll