Michael Hall wrote: "Hmmm.   Isn’t it interesting how many people are ready to pontificate about Neuro-Semantics without reading the works in this field?  I wonder why that is?   By way of contrast, it seems that those who do read into the field of Neuro-Semantics typically come to a different conclusion."    Perhaps the reason many people are ready to pontificate about Neuro-Semantics without reading the works in this field, is due to special appearences you make like this one, that seem to be nothing more than an intellegent individual elbowing their way into the history of NLP by pushing others great people out.  John Grinder's professional approach to challenging parts of your work amplifies the unprofessional approach you have chose to take in responding to him. I do not doubt you do good work, but I have a Vi in a position that occupies the likes of the poloticians that have been runing negitive ads lately. Please note the intention in your communication and any difference in response you have received. It speaks volumes.