Topic: | Origins - Watzlawick |
Posted by: | Ian Newton |
Date/Time: | 04/06/2002 14:10:47 |
Enjoyed very much reading the book and agree with both the intent and analysis it contains (with only one or two caveats) - thanks very much for putting all of it into written form Our own NLP trainings are congruent (at least in intention) with your proposed standards in NLP so I would be happy to support them (and indeed our NLP trainings have done so explicitly over the last ten years) May I ask one quick question to satisfy my own curiousity - I was surprised that Watzlawick gets no mention - was Pragmatics of Human Communication an influence or not ? When I read it I assumed it had been a major influence in your development of NLP. (Analogue/Digital and many other terms etc.,) Thanks Ian Newton |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Origins - Watzlawick | 04/06/2002 14:10:47 | Ian Newton |
Re:Origins - Watzlawick | 04/06/2002 18:17:52 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Origins - Watzlawick | 04/06/2002 23:29:46 | Ian Newton |
Re:Re:Re:Origins - Watzlawick | 05/06/2002 03:51:20 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Origins - Watzlawick | 06/06/2002 12:15:10 | Ian Newton |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Origins - Watzlawick | 07/06/2002 01:39:14 | nj |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Origins - Watzlawick | 07/06/2002 08:34:11 | Ian Newton |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Origins - Watzlawick | 07/06/2002 14:26:11 | nj |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Origins - Watzlawick | 07/06/2002 20:41:21 | Ian Newton |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Origins - Watzlawick | 08/06/2002 03:35:01 | nj |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Origins - Watzlawick | 08/06/2002 03:59:46 | Michael Carroll |