Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Why preferred status for kinesthetic system in uncounscious signal system.
Posted by: Mark MacLean
Date/Time: 30/03/2003 04:09:18

Hi John,

Thanks for the clarification.

Further to the discussion, is there any information/research that has or is being done (that you're aware of), in the area of performance regarding the number of bit being attended to consciously at any one time? (and/or how and when it varies from 5 to 9). I've heard that "alertness", and "interest" in a particular context may play a role, but are there any studies in this area?

My suspicion is that sorting and attending to 9 bits, would be higher performance state than sorting and attending to 5, and I'm wondering what states or contexts might influence those differences? And how would one test for it?

I'd be glad to hear your thoughts,

Mark.


Entire Thread

TopicDate PostedPosted By
Why preferred status for kinesthetic system in uncounscious signal system.27/03/2003 15:59:09Robin Manuell
     Re:Why preferred status for kinesthetic system in uncounscious signal system.28/03/2003 03:42:45russ kenworthy
          Re:Re:Why preferred status for kinesthetic system in uncounscious signal system.28/03/2003 09:10:00John Grinder
               Re:Re:Re:Why preferred status for kinesthetic system in uncounscious signal system.29/03/2003 13:07:33Mark MacLean
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Why preferred status for kinesthetic system in uncounscious signal system.29/03/2003 21:47:54John Grinder
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Why preferred status for kinesthetic system in uncounscious signal system.30/03/2003 04:09:18Mark MacLean
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Why preferred status for kinesthetic system in uncounscious signal system.30/03/2003 07:40:54John Grinder
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Why preferred status for kinesthetic system in uncounscious signal system.31/03/2003 01:11:14Mark MacLean
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Why preferred status for kinesthetic system in uncounscious signal system.30/03/2003 14:22:38Jon Edwards
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Why preferred status for kinesthetic system in uncounscious signal system.31/03/2003 02:19:26Mark MacLean
                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Why preferred status for kinesthetic system in uncounscious signal system.31/03/2003 15:29:42Robin Manuell

Forum Home