Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Clarification from John Grinder??
Posted by: Golf Swing Modeler
Date/Time: 16/07/2003 20:38:10

"As the title of this thread is irrelevant to your excellent questions - I have written a full reply to you in a new thread called 'unconscious uptake'"

As there is no new thread, your comment probably can be fairly described as sarcastic (often mindread as angry).  All I'd like to say is 'unconscious uptake' how specifically do you know that?..what sensory acuity, or what I like to call evidence, is used to verify that the 'modeling' actually worked and enabled these people to create golf shots to similar standards of a golf pro?  Since that's what they were modeling, right?  If not what were they doing, specifically?

Entire Thread

TopicDate PostedPosted By
Clarification from John Grinder??11/07/2003 14:19:56ElevandraE
     Re:Clarification from John Grinder??11/07/2003 15:25:30Derek
          Re:Re:Clarification from John Grinder??12/07/2003 15:28:49ElevandraE
          Re:Re:Clarification from John Grinder??12/07/2003 21:08:54Derek
     Re:Clarification from John Grinder??12/07/2003 16:42:25ElevandraE
          Re:Re:Clarification from John Grinder??15/07/2003 11:12:10Michael Carroll
               Re:Re:Re:Clarification from John Grinder??15/07/2003 12:50:52Robert Ballentine
               Re:Re:Re:Clarification from John Grinder??16/07/2003 10:01:28Golf Swing Modeler
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:Clarification from John Grinder??16/07/2003 20:24:40Michael Carroll
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Clarification from John Grinder??16/07/2003 20:38:10Golf Swing Modeler
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Clarification from John Grinder??16/07/2003 21:14:07Golf Swing Modeler
          PLZ READ THIS!!!!!!!!!!!27/07/2003 03:07:00Ali

Forum Home