"As the title of this thread is irrelevant to your excellent questions - I have written a full reply to you in a new thread called 'unconscious uptake'" As there is no new thread, your comment probably can be fairly described as sarcastic (often mindread as angry).  All I'd like to say is 'unconscious uptake' how specifically do you know that?..what sensory acuity, or what I like to call evidence, is used to verify that the 'modeling' actually worked and enabled these people to create golf shots to similar standards of a golf pro?  Since that's what they were modeling, right?  If not what were they doing, specifically?