Topic: | Re:the unconsious has landed |
Posted by: | Ben Razi |
Date/Time: | 01/09/2003 03:08:36 |
t, I think I'll be able to help you with the quotes, but I have never come across a sensory-based description of the unconscious by Dr. Grinder. Because even when he describes various experiences of coming into contact with the unconscious (finger signals or other indications of such a rapport), those descriptions are not of the unconscious but of his experience. Perhaps he considers the unconscious simply a conceptual tool that helps him speak of different patterns, but doesn't actually believe in any type of agency with its own integrity. Ben Razi |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
the unconsious has landed | 31/08/2003 01:49:51 | t |
Re:the unconsious has landed | 01/09/2003 03:08:36 | Ben Razi |
Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 01/09/2003 07:45:56 | Stephen Bray |
Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 02/09/2003 04:09:28 | t |
Re:Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 02/09/2003 08:03:46 | Stephen Bray |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 03/09/2003 20:21:47 | t |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 04/09/2003 06:50:11 | Stephen Bray |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 04/09/2003 15:50:55 | t |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 04/09/2003 19:20:08 | Stephen Bray |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 04/09/2003 19:39:58 | t |