| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Dobson's Subjective Reversal |
| Posted by: | John Grinder |
| Date/Time: | 04/10/2002 02:02:06 |
|
Harlan Now you're scaring me, Harlan. You write, "Yes, that would be the standard definition of collapsing anchors. I have seen Dobson do this in trance however with no apparent use of anchors (except tonal)." Except tonal - what do you think anchors are if they don't include tonal marking (especially in hypnotic contexts where the client's eyes are typically closed and touching requires lots of framing)? Yes, Bandler and I had this patterning going by '75 - years before meeting Dobson - indeed, before meeting Erickson. It was designed by the two of us based on some hints in Satir's work and tons of trial and error work. Harlan, I would appreciate an answer to my last question - did you put a posting by me from this website on eBay? John |