| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Connection between state and context |
| Posted by: | JPG |
| Date/Time: | 14/05/2003 08:51:33 |
|
Dear John Grinder Point 1 You kindly answered to my question. I would have hope that the answer was NO backwards conditioning, for example that the unconscious having already a better choice would have keep it. Reading WITW p245, my concern was about bad conditioning of future new contexts. I mean that if it is possible to have "negative" backward conditioning it must be much EASIER to have negative pre-conditioning in the case of "new" contexts (if new context exist). Point 2 & 3 I should say that my question was beyond the scope of the New Code but as a consequence for me of reading p 245 : spontaneous connections between states and context become obvious to me. A new formulation would be to replace process by sequence (I had some negative feeling using "process" the first time that I have not taken enough in consideration) Naturally qualified that the state is not designed like in the New code but is there at a given moment of time. By a sequence in time, I mean: 1. A person is in a given state unresourceful (or resourceful) 2. A context is evocated by a letter, a phone call (In the example p245 by the adult)… Now reading p245 : "This connects (future pace) the activated state with stimuli that define the context". So I guess that we have to take care of what we connect in our life and what we don't. One way I see to avoid some connections is the kind of ritual that Ericskon used to shift from one activity to another. All the best JPG |