Hypnofan Robert's got it - remember, calibration is the art of associating repetitive configuration of non-verbal behavior with the state that the person being calibrated is in at the point they express these configurations. One interesting issue from my point of view is what the calibrator chooses to calibrate for. You mention two cases: the affair and the filing for divorce. I have a question whether it is possible to reliably identify through calibration such states as those you mention. It certainly is possible to provoke responses to these issues in a way that allows the calibrator to know whether it is an issue for the person being calibrated and clearly, it is possible to calibrate for these states if you have access to the person for some period of time. The question here is whether there are non-verbal signals for such experiences (states) that are universal enough to allow such a calibration of such states without previous observation of the person - signals, for example, as reliable as the eye movment pattern are in indicating the activation of the associated representational system. That is an empherical question. John