| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed |
| Posted by: | t |
| Date/Time: | 02/09/2003 04:09:28 |
|
Thanks for the splicing and diceing, Stephen. It helped. I'm starting to realize that in some ways the authors' are taking a strong intstrumentalist view of subjectivity, but because of the inherent flaws in strong instrumentalist stances, the authors' occasionally jump into a kind of causal-representational realism. Whatever. I would have expected Dr. Grinder to have thrown out the term 'unconscious' right around the same time he threw out the word 'spirit' as a relevent term to NLP modelling... t |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| the unconsious has landed | 31/08/2003 01:49:51 | t |
| Re:the unconsious has landed | 01/09/2003 03:08:36 | Ben Razi |
| Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 01/09/2003 07:45:56 | Stephen Bray |
| Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 02/09/2003 04:09:28 | t |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 02/09/2003 08:03:46 | Stephen Bray |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 03/09/2003 20:21:47 | t |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 04/09/2003 06:50:11 | Stephen Bray |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 04/09/2003 15:50:55 | t |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 04/09/2003 19:20:08 | Stephen Bray |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:the unconsious has landed | 04/09/2003 19:39:58 | t |