Topic: | Re:Re:Content models and F2 |
Posted by: | John Schertzer |
Date/Time: | 30/12/2003 17:52:32 |
John, Martin, I think it would be good to know first what Martin is calling his content model, since all form/process become content on a higher logical level (John, I think you mention this in Whispering), and that the ambiguity of content modeling is that it is essentially metaphorical, which always draws on outside associations. The idea of "living at FA" itself is perhaps less of a true possibility than it is a metaphor for a number of behaviors with the intention of eliminating as much of one's dependency on language as possible, but F2 leaves its fingerprints on the lens, always, and it is important to remember that, and not to assume you've liberated yourself from distortion, when you have in fact created a distortion you are simply less familiar with. best, JS |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Content models and F2 | 30/12/2003 13:39:30 | Martin Messier |
Re:Content models and F2 | 30/12/2003 17:06:07 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Content models and F2 | 30/12/2003 17:44:14 | ny |
Re:Re:Re:Content models and F2 | 30/12/2003 19:11:40 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Content models and F2 | 30/12/2003 19:24:33 | ny |
Re:Re:Content models and F2 | 30/12/2003 17:52:32 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Re:Content models and F2 | 30/12/2003 19:15:46 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Content models and F2 | 30/12/2003 20:37:23 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Content models and F2 | 30/12/2003 18:26:05 | Martin Messier |
Re:Re:Re:Content models and F2 | 30/12/2003 19:17:19 | John Grinder |