Topic: | Re:Re:A question about NLPmodelling |
Posted by: | Robert |
Date/Time: | 02/08/2004 09:26:04 |
Hi e_lie I do not consider the question to be "stupid" by any means. I figured that someone would ask me how I did it. It may actually be important to be able to use John & Carmen's notation to specify which branch of NLP the poster is refering to, to prevent any possible misunderstandings. (That fact that I may have actually started a trend in this forum may actually inflate my ego - or superego to be precise) It is a simple HTML tag. As the "modelling" part is superscript, to do this in HTML, all you have to do is write "NLPmodelling", and it will come out as formatted. I tried to get this formatting in the message box, but when it came to preview, it appeared to display the HTML code rather than the superscript... If the above HTML does actually come out as superscript, click to reply to this post, and then look at what is written in the Topic Box... it should have the relevant HTML tags for you to see. Robert |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
A question about NLPmodelling | 01/08/2004 13:10:31 | Robert |
Re:A question about NLPmodelling | 01/08/2004 15:50:03 | Russ Kenworthy |
Re:Re:A question about NLPmodelling | 14/08/2004 12:53:57 | Robert |
Re:A question about NLPmodelling | 02/08/2004 08:29:38 | e_lie |
Re:Re:A question about NLPmodelling | 02/08/2004 09:26:04 | Robert |
NLPRocks | 03/08/2004 03:59:31 | InnerCalm |
Re:NLPRocks | 03/08/2004 07:59:09 | Robert |
Re:Re:NLPRocks | 16/08/2004 01:51:48 | elie |
Re:Re:A question about NLPmodelling | 02/08/2004 09:31:24 | Robert |
Re:A question about NLPmodelling | 02/08/2004 09:12:37 | Mark MacLean |