| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Connection between state and context |
| Posted by: | JPG |
| Date/Time: | 21/05/2003 19:30:19 |
|
Hi, John Before experiencing neurologically with my own representations of the new code format (with a guide) I would like a precision about step 2 of the New Code (NC). My perception of the NC is : connecting a high performance state to the context of the “problem” state. So, my guess is that the MAIN motivation behind step 2(“localize physically this hallucinated context …This is also the opportunity for the coach to calibrate your present state response to the context in question”) is to get an anchor of the context RATHER than of the problem state. I mean some triggers that the client see, hear, smell when he enters the context problem. My intuition (after reading a posting on this forum) is that in the case of too much emphasises on the problem state (sometimes an intense negative feeling) the two anchors might collapse (like in the collapsing anchors pattern but that NC is more in the spirit of a Swish). My idea, when the problem state is intense would be to split step 2 in two different working places : - One to investigate (not too much) about the problem state (find the triggers, possibly calibrate the response of the client) - another where to anchor the context problem Can you comment on that and more specifically give the main motivations behind step 2. All the best JPG |