Topic: | Re:N-L systems & psychology |
Posted by: | John Schertzer |
Date/Time: | 10/06/2003 14:03:14 |
Keith, Hope you don't mind my butting in, but what do you mean by "psychology?" Do you mean the cognitive-behavioral approach taught in most (not all) clini psych PhD programs particularly in the US? To my understanding, this is only one of numerous flavors, though in a sense, you're right, it has become "psychology," the way the neo-conservative view, in the US, has apparently become the only way to be patriotic while were weren't looking. But then contemporary psychoanalysis (for instance, a possible "psychology") probably *functions* a lot more like Ericksonian psychotherapy than most people think. I know a Freudian who, without being aware of it, is an excellent matcher, and who's work efficacy I believe relies more on implied causal linkages than the drive theory. Pardon me, again, for digressing. best, JS |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
N-L systems & psychology | 10/06/2003 10:37:08 | Keith |
Re:N-L systems & psychology | 10/06/2003 14:03:14 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:N-L systems & psychology | 12/06/2003 00:52:55 | Keith |
Re:Re:Re:N-L systems & psychology | 12/06/2003 01:09:13 | Ryan N. |
Re:Re:Re:N-L systems & psychology | 12/06/2003 14:15:56 | John Schertzer |
Re:N-L systems & psychology | 10/06/2003 17:52:03 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:N-L systems & psychology | 10/06/2003 19:28:42 | John Schertzer |
Re:N-L systems & psychology | 10/06/2003 18:31:36 | Ryan N. |
Re:Re:N-L systems & psychology | 11/06/2003 04:21:22 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:N-L systems & psychology | 11/06/2003 10:12:09 | Keith |
Re:Re:Re:N-L systems & psychology | 11/06/2003 14:01:57 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Re:Re:N-L systems & psychology | 11/06/2003 14:19:36 | Lewis Walker |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:N-L systems & psychology | 11/06/2003 15:03:13 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Re:N-L systems & psychology | 11/06/2003 17:12:47 | Ryan N. |
Re:Re:Re:Re:N-L systems & psychology | 11/06/2003 17:20:39 | John Grinder |