Topic: | Re:Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication |
Posted by: | Martin Messier |
Date/Time: | 31/07/2003 19:34:16 |
Hi Robert, Geez, thanks to you and a few others, my ppd (postings per day) rate is skyrocketing! I appreciate your points. Indeed, if used as a trademark, NLPapplications could provide a useful distinction between content and process models. Speaking of which, could you provide an example of a model that you consider to be content? How do you define a content model? What about a process model? The more we talk about it, the less I feel I have accurate command of those concepts... Rock on! Martin |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 31/07/2003 16:59:57 | Martin Messier |
Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 31/07/2003 17:59:35 | Robert Ballentine |
Re:Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 31/07/2003 19:34:16 | Martin Messier |
Re:Re:Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 31/07/2003 21:35:47 | doug |
Re:Re:Re:Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 31/07/2003 23:48:07 | Tony |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 01/08/2003 00:14:46 | pat |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 01/08/2003 03:28:22 | Tony |
Re:Re:Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 01/08/2003 12:41:38 | Robert Ballentine |