Topic: | Re:Re:Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication |
Posted by: | doug |
Date/Time: | 31/07/2003 21:35:47 |
I'm with Martin here. I'd love to see a couple examples of such dinstinctions. I'd also propose that we MUST now introduce "NLPw" for NLP WHY. There is a growing esoteric movement within NLP that is not ready to throw out 'why' in every context of NLP...that was a bad joke with a small kernal of seriousness... doug |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 31/07/2003 16:59:57 | Martin Messier |
Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 31/07/2003 17:59:35 | Robert Ballentine |
Re:Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 31/07/2003 19:34:16 | Martin Messier |
Re:Re:Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 31/07/2003 21:35:47 | doug |
Re:Re:Re:Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 31/07/2003 23:48:07 | Tony |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 01/08/2003 00:14:46 | pat |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 01/08/2003 03:28:22 | Tony |
Re:Re:Re:NLPmodeling vs NLPapplication | 01/08/2003 12:41:38 | Robert Ballentine |