| Topic: | Re:Re:A Simple Question? |
| Posted by: | InnerCalm |
| Date/Time: | 30/09/2003 18:25:57 |
|
Stephen Bray wrote: Your question is not just simple but noble, deep and concise. But of course it is presented devoid of context. Aside from challenging the universal quantifier 'all'; in which good practice demands that we look for counter-examples i.e. 'are there ever times when content is not metaphorical __________________________________________________ So "Context" is the meaning presented by the metaphor, even though the metaphor may be a deeply embeded or primitive belief or strategy, yet it can also be a new idea or concept, or reality it's self, depending on which method(old or new)we use to identify with our environment. While "Content" are the relational operaters used to convey the meaning or "Context" within the metaphor. I find this formula to be accurate in explaining The concept of rapport. I also find it to be accutate in explaining perception, although harder to explain. lol |