Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions
Posted by: Mark MacLean
Date/Time: 02/08/2004 17:25:35

Hi GSM,

My intention was to start a dialog that would answer/tease out these questions/ideas.

Haven't I outlined the direction I was planning on heading, and how we might (eventually) arrive at those questions about "placing significance"? How did my questions/direction not fit with what you are asking about? Were my questions about process, and the value of asking questions not moving fast enough for you? ;-)

So, you've mentioned a number of models discussed in Whispering. And want to place some "significance" of the role of questions within the context of the new code model. Understood. I am also interested in those ideas, and discussing them, however, it seems to me that the "role of questions", is worthy of consideration first...before, searching for it's place within new code. Once we have some ideas about what how questions work, and their utility/function, then their role might become more apparent in all those specific new code contexts. What do you think?

Mark MacLean


Entire Thread

TopicDate PostedPosted By
The quality of questions31/07/2004 19:24:49GSM
     Re:The quality of questions31/07/2004 22:49:25Robert Kamala
          Re:Re:The quality of questions01/08/2004 08:20:01GSM
               Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 09:49:59Mark MacLean
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 10:12:36GSM
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 10:25:16Mark MacLean
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 13:22:14GSM
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 17:25:35Mark MacLean
                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 18:21:59GSM
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions03/08/2004 04:41:24Mark MacLean
                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 10:35:21GSM
                                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions05/08/2004 08:24:11Mark MacLean
                                                            Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions05/08/2004 16:26:11GSM
                                             Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 15:25:18Greg Alexander
                                                  Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 15:37:22GSM
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 22:28:37nj
                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 10:20:06GSM
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 11:30:33nj
                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 11:32:42GSM
                                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 11:54:19nj
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 21:51:05John Schertzer
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 10:19:18GSM
               Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 09:53:15Mark MacLean
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 10:25:00GSM
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions05/08/2004 10:36:03Mark MacLean
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions05/08/2004 16:42:23GSM
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions06/08/2004 02:54:05Mark MacLean

Forum Home