Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions
Posted by: nj
Date/Time: 02/08/2004 22:28:37

Don't conflate a taxonomy's members into a single logical level.  You might want a taxonomy of questions that establish detailed, precise identity conditions for questions that are of different types, each of which might be relevant to one or more of the other concepts you mentioned, named:

"perception", "focus", "behavior",  "outcomes", "f2 transforms", "feedforward process",....

While exploring or developing that taxonomy, your tree of logical levels might be deep or shallow.  It's possible that questions, as types, might all be mutually exclusive, with respect to those types of questions that are relevant to "perception", "focus", "behavior"....  Your logical level tree would then be shallow or "bushy", as I think it's called.  But it's possible that your logical level tree would show that some of the concepts you're relating to questions establish, by their relationship, logical levels of questions that are nested inside each other  (cross-nested, too, maybe).

If you're wanting to learn the scripts of verbal communication that are relevant to the instruments of distinction that are the concepts "perception", "focus", ...., your question seems to ask whether those scripts include processes of asking questions, having questions, answering questions (to yourself or to others), or generating questions (which you might (not) ask).

So your question as to the role of questions....

Maybe you want to know what roles are currently played by questions?  You'd like a list?  Or an analysis of the appropriateness of questions in the roles they currently occupy, with respect to processes in which all those distinctions you mentioned are used as instruments of analysis?  Or are at least resources for producing analyses?  Or are simply relevant to the products of an analysis in which the roles of questions are analyzed?  Or....

Gosh, there's so much, and, somehow, it never makes it onto this website....

Maybe you have a complaint about someone's questions?  Or someone's discussion of questions?  Or a concern?...


Entire Thread

TopicDate PostedPosted By
The quality of questions31/07/2004 19:24:49GSM
     Re:The quality of questions31/07/2004 22:49:25Robert Kamala
          Re:Re:The quality of questions01/08/2004 08:20:01GSM
               Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 09:49:59Mark MacLean
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 10:12:36GSM
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 10:25:16Mark MacLean
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 13:22:14GSM
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 17:25:35Mark MacLean
                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 18:21:59GSM
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions03/08/2004 04:41:24Mark MacLean
                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 10:35:21GSM
                                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions05/08/2004 08:24:11Mark MacLean
                                                            Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions05/08/2004 16:26:11GSM
                                             Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 15:25:18Greg Alexander
                                                  Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 15:37:22GSM
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 22:28:37nj
                                        Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 10:20:06GSM
                                             Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 11:30:33nj
                                                  Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 11:32:42GSM
                                                       Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 11:54:19nj
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 21:51:05John Schertzer
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 10:19:18GSM
               Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions02/08/2004 09:53:15Mark MacLean
                    Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions04/08/2004 10:25:00GSM
                         Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions05/08/2004 10:36:03Mark MacLean
                              Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions05/08/2004 16:42:23GSM
                                   Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:The quality of questions06/08/2004 02:54:05Mark MacLean

Forum Home