Topic: | To Peter Davies |
Posted by: | Michael Carrol |
Date/Time: | 13/11/2002 03:28:32 |
Peter, Thanks for your post You wrote "The apparent differences between us seem to centre on the value or otherwise to be given to the Neuro-Semantic Model of Meta-States. When I said you were wrong I should have been more specific and said that I think you are wrong about the value to be given to meta-states." My reply; I ask again- for you to provide me with sensory based description, this time relating to how I am wrong about the value to be given to meta states. I have a probing mind, and when I am told I am wrong, I like to find out HOW. The same applies when I am told I am right. That's how I learn. You wrote"Actually maybe not even wrong, just a feeling that you are missing an opportunity to explore this new domain that emerges naturally out of NLP." My probing mind still welcomes that sensory based description of how you originally thought I was wrong or not, relating to the PATTERN we discussed in this thread as well as sensory based description of what you consider is right. Then I can work out for myself if I am missing out on something. Peter you say I am missing out on opportunity explore this new domain: I am attempting to explore it. I am finding the exploration challenging when you as a person trained in meta states (which I think you are) will not engage in discussion on pattern. Look forward to your reply Michael Carroll |