Topic: | Re:Re:Re:'attention' as nominalization |
Posted by: | Constance |
Date/Time: | 13/08/2002 19:01:53 |
OK, here I go...let me seeeeeeee.......... Obviously, given the rediculous (yet interesting) context you have established I can only give a pseudo answer.... I think of attention in these contexts as the agent choosing to occupy/filter certain selected sets of representations over others...The only way to really find out would be to meta model and observe the actual person, but I agree with you that it is possible to generalize as to the nature of attending... now, what are you thinking about? Constance P.S. I read a few of your earlier posts and am very excited to have a few very specific discussions with you in the context of the historical backdrop for NLP's development...get ready, JR. |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
'attention' as nominalization | 12/08/2002 04:29:47 | J Rose |
Re:'attention' as nominalization | 13/08/2002 03:08:17 | Constance |
Re:Re:'attention' as nominalization | 13/08/2002 12:47:11 | J Rose |
Re:Re:Re:'attention' as nominalization | 13/08/2002 19:01:53 | Constance |
To:JR, Re: relevancy of your request to the content of 'Whispering In The Wind' | 13/08/2002 08:59:22 | nj |
Re:'attention' as nominalization | 13/08/2002 21:51:56 | Dimitry |
Re:Re:'attention' as nominalization | 14/08/2002 04:26:56 | Gunthar Freidinger |
Re:Re:Re:'attention' as nominalization | 14/08/2002 15:27:29 | Thomas |
Re:Re:Re:Re:'attention' as nominalization | 15/08/2002 03:22:14 | Gunthar Freidinger |