Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:'attention' as nominalization |
Posted by: | Gunthar Freidinger |
Date/Time: | 15/08/2002 03:22:14 |
Yes, Thomas, I think I should not have chosen the word 'correlative' because it does not contain the exact meaning I search for. I would say a relationship does exist between this ability to attend and physiology- yet as the violin does not create the music, however it fundamentally conditions it, I think the body (nervous system) has the same relationship to the capacity of attention. I can, and should, say more about this, but have no time at this right now. Yes, correlative is wrong word here. Gunthar |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
'attention' as nominalization | 12/08/2002 04:29:47 | J Rose |
Re:'attention' as nominalization | 13/08/2002 03:08:17 | Constance |
Re:Re:'attention' as nominalization | 13/08/2002 12:47:11 | J Rose |
Re:Re:Re:'attention' as nominalization | 13/08/2002 19:01:53 | Constance |
To:JR, Re: relevancy of your request to the content of 'Whispering In The Wind' | 13/08/2002 08:59:22 | nj |
Re:'attention' as nominalization | 13/08/2002 21:51:56 | Dimitry |
Re:Re:'attention' as nominalization | 14/08/2002 04:26:56 | Gunthar Freidinger |
Re:Re:Re:'attention' as nominalization | 14/08/2002 15:27:29 | Thomas |
Re:Re:Re:Re:'attention' as nominalization | 15/08/2002 03:22:14 | Gunthar Freidinger |