| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Modeling and NLP |
| Posted by: | Pete West |
| Date/Time: | 05/11/2003 20:42:30 |
|
Great questions. You wrote, "On 56 New Code is said to be based in design, though it is still unclear to me how the alphabet game was developed specifically from the parameters discovered in Classic NLP." As I'm sure that you'll recall, Dr.Grinder credits Roger Tabb of the Beaverton Optometric Group in Beaverton, Oregon with introducing him to a "series of exercises that greatly influenced the development of the form of the new code" (WITW p.263) Having personally studied with Roger Tabb, I can tell you that the series of exercises that he introduced me to was VERY similar in form to the presentations that I've read from JG/CBSC and others on offer from participants of this forum regarding the Alphabet game and the NASA game- though Dr.Tabb didn't label the exercises that I was led through as such or as "New Code games" for that matter. So while the alphabet game might not have been developed specifically from the parameters discovered in classic NLP, its' application by JG may have been by design...an ingenious one I might add. I hope that helps. For further content re. Roger Tabb/PST, see my post from 11/07/03 in the other new code games thread. -Pete |