| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change |
| Posted by: | Todd |
| Date/Time: | 26/11/2003 03:45:03 |
|
John, Thanks for the clarification on this one. 1st and 2nd order being applicable to classic code puts it all together for me. I missed that in the text if it was there. I was definitely a bit stuck on applying the distinctions to new code work. Additionally, I am more of an anthropologist than a cowboy or, to put it another way, "ecology rules" thus the difficulty finding a useful 1st order example. Thanks again, Todd |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 06/11/2003 05:34:41 | Todd Sloane |
| Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 07/11/2003 19:10:56 | John Schertzer |
| Re:Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 08/11/2003 02:57:40 | Todd |
| Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 16/11/2003 01:52:28 | Todd |
| Re:Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 17/11/2003 04:26:24 | Cloey Z |
| Re:Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 19/11/2003 22:18:41 | John Grinder |
| Re:Re:Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 26/11/2003 03:45:03 | Todd |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 26/11/2003 06:58:19 | John Grinder |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 02/12/2003 03:50:19 | Todd |