Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change |
Posted by: | Todd |
Date/Time: | 02/12/2003 03:50:19 |
John, Thanks for the additional infill and the example. It does help. I am definitely an anthoplogist although I am glad to find myself a cowboy whenever I do. Hey, a cowboy anthropologist! I do the type of congruency check that you talk about in all the work I do. (I am calling the calibration regarding the presence of secondary gain sufficient to prevent "lasting" change a congruency check here.) It seems essential to effective work. (Otherwise, why have another person in the room! ;-) ) I sometimes forget that this is a public forum as I tend to think about posting as a "conversation" between myself and another. However, since it is public I would like to give a big agknowledgement to Susan Grace-Branch and Judy DeLozier who provided my practitioner training. The integration of new code into my learning, my practice and my neurology continues to amaze me and I am very very grateful. It sounds like it could have been different and I am glad that it wasn't. I would also like to learn "live" from you and Carmen. Are your public events posted by the webmaster here as a matter of course? If not, how can I stay informed? Thanks again. Todd |
Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 06/11/2003 05:34:41 | Todd Sloane |
Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 07/11/2003 19:10:56 | John Schertzer |
Re:Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 08/11/2003 02:57:40 | Todd |
Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 16/11/2003 01:52:28 | Todd |
Re:Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 17/11/2003 04:26:24 | Cloey Z |
Re:Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 19/11/2003 22:18:41 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 26/11/2003 03:45:03 | Todd |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 26/11/2003 06:58:19 | John Grinder |
Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Applications: 1st and 2nd order change | 02/12/2003 03:50:19 | Todd |