| Topic: | Re:Re:Re:Re:Pheros v.s. NLP??? |
| Posted by: | zhizhichien |
| Date/Time: | 11/12/2003 06:07:34 |
|
It seems to me that a pheramone might be an element of state. If you could qualify the type or difference in pheramones then an nlp trainer such as spike could use the test to verify whether or not his trainee was congruent or noncongruent or aroused or underaroused (sympathetically/parasympathetically or confident or whatever. I could imagine other useful tests especially in criminal justice,dating, and politics. |
| Topic | Date Posted | Posted By |
| Pheros v.s. NLP??? | 10/12/2003 20:14:18 | Frankie |
| Re:Pheros v.s. NLP??? | 10/12/2003 21:50:23 | Spike |
| Re:Pheros v.s. NLP??? | 10/12/2003 22:47:55 | Todd |
| Re:Re:Pheros v.s. NLP??? | 11/12/2003 02:30:39 | Frankie |
| Re:Re:Re:Pheros v.s. NLP??? | 11/12/2003 03:14:01 | Dimitry |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Pheros v.s. NLP??? | 11/12/2003 06:07:34 | zhizhichien |
| Re:Re:Re:Pheros v.s. NLP??? | 11/12/2003 09:20:34 | Bob |
| Re:Re:Re:Pheros v.s. NLP??? | 11/12/2003 14:24:17 | spike |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Pheros v.s. NLP??? | 11/12/2003 18:01:44 | Mark MacLean |
| Re:Re:Re:Pheros v.s. NLP??? | 11/12/2003 16:37:12 | Web Master |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Pheros v.s. NLP??? | 11/12/2003 23:46:11 | Frankie |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Pheros v.s. NLP??? | 12/12/2003 04:49:43 | Jose Alarcon |
| Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Pheros v.s. NLP??? | 12/12/2003 06:56:15 | Stephen Bray |